BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Nazir v customs & Excise [2005] UKVAT V19104 (06 June 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19104.html
Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19104

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]



     
    Mohammed Nazir v customs & Excise [2005] UKVAT V19104 (06 June 2005)
    19104
    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/0082
    MOHAMMED NAZIR Appellant
    and
    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
    Tribunal Chairman: Richard Barlow
    Sitting in public in Manchester on the 24 May 2005
    DIRECTION
    under Rule 30(8)
    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 12 December 2003 in the sum of £807.53 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
    And upon hearing Mr S Nazir for the Appellant and Mr R Mansell of the Acting Solicitor for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents and upon Mr Mansell having stated that HM Revenue and Customs now concede that there was a reasonable excuse for the default
    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision accordingly
    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal
    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed
    And that there is to be no direction as to costs
    RICHARD BARLOW
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date: 6 June 2005
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19104.html