BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Pro-Pin Ltd (t/a parkwood Contractors) v Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19281 (06 October 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19281.html
Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19281

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

Pro-Pin Ltd T/a parkwood Contractors v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19281 (06 October 2005)

     
    19281

    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/0285

    PRO-PIN LIMITED trading as PARKWOOD CONTRACTORS Appellant

    and

    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal Chairman: Elsie Gilliland

    Sitting in public in Manchester on the 22 September 2005

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 14 January 2005 in the sum of £5,774.08 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    And upon hearing Stuart Hindle for the Appellant and Bernard Haley of the Acting Solicitor for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents

    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal

    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed

    And that there is to be no direction as to costs

    ELSIE GILLILAND
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date: 6 October 2005
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19281.html