BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Journals |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Journals >> Wight URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/WebJCLI/1997/issue3/wight3.html Cite as: Wight |
[New search] [Help]
Lecturer in Law
University of Essex
Copyright © 1997 Robert Wight.
First Published in Web Journal of Current Legal Issues in association with
Blackstone Press Ltd.
Over the last decade, Environmental Law as an academic speciality has found
a place in the undergraduate syllabuses of most universities. This development
has brought forth a demand for texts on environmental law which shows little
sign of abating, judging by the wide range of titles currently devoted to
the subject. Rather surprisingly, considering the range of human activity
which affects the environment, these texts tend to be rather similar in both
form and substance, dealing primarily with specific legal provisions which
exist to protect various media (land, air, water) and the sources from which
such measures derive, domestic, international and, of course regional, through
the activities of the European Community (EC). The activities of the latter
have had such an impact upon the environmental law of member states that
EC environmental law has become almost a sub-speciality amongst lawyers,
with courses and academic texts devoted exclusively to describing and analysing
the wide range of EC activity affecting the environment. It is true that
many of such courses and texts tend to reflect the agenda set in the general
environmental text books and this creates a difficulty.
First, the protection of the environment was not one of the aims of the original Treaty of Rome. As frequently pointed out, the word 'environment' does not appear in the original Treaty which did not expressly contain a basis for environmental law-making until the advent of the Single European Act in 1986. The extensive legislation which appeared before this date can best be referred to as environment-related (Ziegler's phrase), since much of it (including the Directives on pollution control which form the staple diet of the EC environmental lawyer) was aimed at achieving the conditions necessary for the establishment and functioning of the single market. The point is that the subject matter of EC environmental law cannot be adequately dealt with in isolation from the overall aims of the Treaties. Attempts to circumscribe the subject in terms of TITLE XVI and the pollution Directives can provide the student or reader with a distinctly limited, incomplete and distorted view of the role played by EC institutions in the environmental field. For example, one of the main pillars of the EC has been the promotion of free movement of goods. It is obvious that if member states impose differing product standards in order to comply with divergent environmental regulations this will create obstacles to free trade in such goods. The Commission is, therefore, likely to take action, not necessarily to tackle low environmental standards in some member states, but primarily to attain an internal market in those goods. A proper analysis of such EC legislation must take the entire purpose of the legislation into account and not lose sight of the primary aims of the EC Treaty. To gain a more holistic view of the subject, I would certainly recommend the text under review which, as appears from the cover, contains
"the most comprehensive overview yet published of the European Community legal mechanisms and rules concerning the relationship between the establishment of the Single European Market and the development of international, European and domestic environmental law."
What Ziegler's text highlights is the need to strike a balance between the
responsibilities of the EC institutions under EC law and the responsibilities
of member states in the area of environmental protection. In effect, one
of the main roles of the European Court is to identify and eliminate what
may be termed examples of green protectionism which are incompatible with
the Treaty. As the author writes, "To find the balance is often a very difficult
and delicate task."(p 5)
The text is divided into two parts. Part I examines the extent to which member
states can take steps to protect their environments without infringing the
freedoms and principles created by the common market. Part II describes the
extent to which the EC has itself acted to harmonise environmental
standards.
Starting from first principles, Ziegler takes the Community concept of free
movement of goods and discusses its significance for domestic regulatory
measures. As long as the concept of 'goods' is capable of embracing waste
and packaging it is understandable, on environmental grounds, that states
may wish to impose restrictions on the import of such materials. Whether
such restrictions take the form of a quota system, or is a "measure having
equivalent effect", it may be prohibited by Art 30 unless the measures are
permitted by Art 36. This allows states to depart from the strictures of
Arts 30 and 34, on the grounds, inter alia, of protecting the health
and life of humans, animals or plants. Interestingly, the article does not
expressly refer to measures protecting the environment although the European
Court has included such measures under Art 36. Indeed, the case law on Art
36 probably contains the most interesting discussions of environmental protection
measures before the introduction of the Environment Chapter into the Treaty.
Most readers will be familiar, for example, with the discussion in the famous
'Danish bottles' case (302/86). Ziegler then proceeds to identify the conditions
which must be present if the Court is to uphold such domestic measures viz,
they must not be contrary to secondary law; they must genuinely be made in
the interest of protecting the environment; they must not be discriminatory
as between domestic and imported products, and they must be proportionate.
Ziegler concludes Part I by considering measures which may fall foul of Community
Competition Law. Examples brought before the Court have included an industry
joint-venture scheme for recycling glass and a voluntary agreement entered
into by a member state and domestic industry for the environmental purpose
of limiting the use of CFC's. A second category of cases have involved the
use of state aid i.e. the provision of financial incentives by the member
state in order to promote environmentally sound behaviour. The latter are
generally prohibited under Art 92 but exceptions are permitted on a case
by case basis. Ziegler includes the Guidelines on State Aid for Environmental
Protection [1994] OJ C 72/3-9 in an Annex. The use of state aid does, of
course, give rise to serious concern about whether they breach the 'polluter
pays' principle.
Part II presents an overview of the EC's environmental (or environmental-related)
policy. The initial question is to decide what effect the subsidiarity principle
(Art 3a) has, or will have, on this policy. The principle provides that the
Community should only act where [the protection of the environment] can be
better protected at Community level than at national level. This remains
to be seen, and Ziegler's only comment is to note that it will be hard to
arrive at a demarcation line. Personally, I have always thought that
environmental protection is, par excellence, an area in which the
role of the Community should be paramount, a view which appears to coincide
with that of the current UK Government.
A second, preliminary point is to decide upon which article to base secondary
legislation. This is something of a vexed question because, as stated above,
measures which deal with, say, the problem of waste disposal, will also affect
the functioning of the internal market, thus providing the legislator with
a choice of article upon which to base his directive. Under changes wrought
by the Maastricht Treaty the choice is far more than of academic interest
because of differences in the voting procedures in Council and the rights
of the European Parliament which turn upon the choice of article. I found
Ziegler's Chapter on this complex issue particularly lucid.
Ziegler then provides an overview of EC environmental policy as it appears
in Art 130 r-t, and highlights the link between this and other policy areas
which affect the environment, notably the Common Agricultural Policy and
the Common Transport Policy. There is now an obligation to integrate
environmental concerns into both policies, but not a great deal has been
done under the latter. This is, perhaps, unfortunate due to the serious effects
of vehicle emissions on atmospheric pollution, but it does allow member states
freedom to adopt (or not to adopt) their own measures in this area.
The standard EC approach to environmental regulation through prohibitions,
restrictions and fixed standards is well known and well documented. EC lawyers
are perhaps less familiar with the alternative approach to environmental
protection which is also within the remit of the EC i.e. the imposition of
so-called green taxes, meaning higher taxes imposed on goods which are not
produced in an environmentally-friendly manner, or the provision of subsidies
or financial incentives for those which are. The Community can adopt provisions
for the harmonisation of indirect taxation (Art 99), provided they are necessary
for the establishment of the internal market. Again, not a great deal has
happened so far, so member states are free to introduce their own environmental
taxes (for example, the UK landfill tax). Perhaps the most interesting proposal
in this field has been the much discussed energy tax to combat global warming
from carbon dioxide emissions. Ziegler notes that EC industry is generally
opposed to the proposal on the grounds that most non-EC countries do not
have such taxes. A quasi-fiscal role for the UN would be an interesting proposal!
Environmental subsidies from the EC are available, for example, under the
LIFE programme but one is left to wonder whether this falls within the spirit
of the polluter pays principle.
The penultimate chapter discusses the external role of the EC in both framing
and implementing international environmental policy. Ziegler discusses the
respective competencies of the EC and its component member states to enter
into international agreements. It seems that the EC has the power to enter
into international commitments which are necessary to achieve the objectives
of the Treaty. In any event, the EC has signed a number of Multilateral
Environmental Agreements. Ziegler also refers to the Community's role in
signing commodity agreements with third party states incorporating environmental
conditions (for example, the trade in tropical timber) and adopting direct
trade-related environmental measures (TREMs) to protect the non-domestic
environment. The final Chapter contains Ziegler's conclusions about the need
to find a balance regarding the protection of the environment in the EC context,
i.e. to integrate the single market with the need for environmental protection.
This is an excellent and worthy addition to any environmental lawyer's library.
It is a concise, comprehensive and clearly written overview of a crucial
area of law, not always highlighted in general environmental texts. I view
it as an invaluable, relatively up to date (January 1996) reference tool,
which comes combined with exhaustive footnoted references to primary and
secondary sources (not confined to those written in English) and a useful
bibliography.
Although the necessity of achieving a balance between the requirements of
environmental protection and the requirements of the single market is highlighted
by the book, Ziegler seems rather reluctant to comment upon whether the balance
presently attained is satisfactory. This is unfortunate in that the opinion
of an academic of such undoubted expertise as displayed by Ziegler would
be invaluable. Still, I shall certainly look out for future publications
of this author where he will perhaps feel less constrained about advancing
his personal opinions.
A final point worth mentioning is that Ziegler writes as a non EC citizen;
he is Swiss. He is therefore spared the understandable temptation to approach
his subject from a domestic perspective, a weakness of some writing in this
area.