BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Irish Law Reform Commission Papers and Reports


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Irish Law Reform Commission Papers and Reports >> Judgment Mortgages, Consultation Paper on (LRC CP 30-2004) [2004] IELRC CP30(3) (March 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/other/IELRC/2004/CP30(3).html
Cite as: [2004] IELRC CP30(3)

[New search] [Help]


    START OF PAGE 31

    CHAPTER 3 THE LEGAL POSITION IN SELECTED
    JURISDICTIONS
  1. 01 The judgment mortgage procedure exists, in one form or

    another, in other common law jurisdictions. It is instructive to

    consider briefly the position in some of those other jurisdictions.

    A England and Wales
  2. 02 Under the Charging Orders Act 1979 it is open to a

    judgment creditor obtaining a decree from the High Court or County

    Court to apply to court for a charging order for the purpose of

    enforcing judgment. The court has discretion as to whether or not to

    make a charging order. If the order is made, it imposes on specified

    property of the judgment debtor a charge for securing the payment of

    any money due under the judgment. The charge covers any interest

    of the judgment debtor under a trust, land held on bare trust for the

    judgment debtor, and land held by two or more judgment debtors who

    together are entitled to the whole unencumbered beneficial interest

    under a trust.

  3. 03 The 1979 Act provides that the statutory charge is

    enforceable "in the same manner as an equitable charge created by the

    debtor by writing under his hand".[1] Accordingly, the judgment

    creditor is entitled to invoke legal process for the purpose of realising

    his or her security together with appropriate interest and the costs of

    enforcing the charging order. The judgment creditor can apply to

    court for an order for sale, or for the appointment of a receiver.

  4. 04 A judgment mortgage is not capable of being registered as

    a mortgage against the jointly owned interest of the judgment debtor.

    In such circumstances only a caution may be registered in the case of

    registered land. With regard to unregistered land, no registration

    against jointly owned interests is possible. Accordingly, a judgment

    START OF PAGE 32

    creditor in such circumstances will lose priority to a later mortgagee

    of the legal interest.[2]

  5. 05 As noted above, in England and Wales the court has a

    discretion as to whether or not to make a charging order.

    Furthermore, it has the discretion as to whether an existing order

    should be varied or rescinded, and as to whether an order for

    immediate sale should be made. The court must consider all the

    circumstances of the case, the personal circumstances of the debtor,

    and whether any other creditor would be unduly prejudiced by the

    making of the order. Where the charging order is over the family

    home, there is no "presumption one way or the other"[3] as to whether

    the court will make an order.

    B Northern Ireland
  6. 06 The procedure for the enforcement of judgments by way of

    charging order is governed in Northern Ireland by the Judgments

    Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.[4] That order establishes

    the Enforcement of Judgments Office ('the Office').[5] A judgment

    creditor whose judgment remains unsatisfied may apply to the Office

    upon payment of a fee for the enforcement of a judgment. The Office

    may impose on any land of the judgment debtor as may be specified

    in the order, a charge for securing the payment of the amount

    recoverable on foot of the judgment. An order may be expressed as

    absolute, or subject to conditions as to notification of the judgment

    debtor or otherwise. Article 46(3) provides that the order does not

    take effect until it is registered in the Land Registry (in the case of

    registered land) or the Registry of Deeds (in the case of unregistered

    land).

  7. 07 A charging order ceases to have effect when the period of
    12 years has expired from the date of judgment.[6]

    START OF PAGE 33

  8. 08 Article 48 of the 1981 Order provides that an order charging

    the estate of registered land of which the judgment debtor is not the

    registered owner may not be made: instead a caution may be

    registered against the judgment debtor's interest.

  9. 09 Article 49 provides that, subject to certain exceptions, a

    charging order has the same effect on the land as a charge created by

    the debtor in favour of the creditor. The exceptions are as follows:

    (a) the order does not take effect until registered;[7]
    (b) the order expires 12 years after judgment;[8]
    (c) an order charging the estate of registered land may not be

    registered;[9]

    (d) subject to the terms of the order, the judgment creditor has

    all the powers of sale of a mortgagee under a mortgage by

    deed pursuant to the Conveyancing Acts 1881 to 1911.

  10. 10 The Office may give notices of eviction in order to deliver

    vacant possession of premises, and remove goods to a place of safety.

    However, where the premises are used as a dwelling, it must give not

    less than seven days notice to the local Health and Social Services

    Board.

    C Canada – British Columbia
  11. 11 The statutory scheme for execution of judgments against

    land in British Columbia is contained in sections 33 to 63 of the

    Execution Act 1969.[10] If a plaintiff obtains judgment from a court in

    the province he or she may obtain a certificate of such judgment from

    the court and tender it for registration in the appropriate Land

    Registry office.

  12. 12 Before 1981 the situation was that upon registration the

    name of the debtor was entered in an index known as the register of

    judgments. This register was referable to the name of the defendant.

    START OF PAGE 34

    It was not referable to the folio numbers of land held by the

    defendant. Notation was also made on any certificate of title held by

    the defendant. Registration was effective for two years and was

    renewable.

  13. 13 At this point it is worth noting two practical effects of this

    type of system. First, the judgment creditor need not find out if the

    judgment debtor actually owns an interest in land. The judgment

    creditor could simply register the judgment and if the judgment

    debtor happens to own land the registration would catch that land.

    Secondly, such a system was capable of affecting not only interests in

    land as at the date of registration, but also interest in land acquired by

    the judgment debtor after registration.

  14. 14 The provisions of the Execution Act were amended by the
    Execution Amendment Act 1978.[11] The amendment Act provided for

    registration of the judgment directly against the title of property

    owned by the judgment debtor in the same manner as any other

    charge. The effect of this was therefore to eliminate the indices of

    judgments in the various land registry offices.

  15. 15 Such a change broadly corresponds with the current

    situation under Irish law where the judgment creditor must identify

    the specific property in which the judgment debtor has an interest

    before registration can occur. Under the scheme in British Columbia

    the judgment creditor could register against the judgment debtor on

    the speculative possibility that the judgment debtor owned an interest

    in land.

  16. 16 Another side effect of the amendment was that the

    registration would not affect interests in land acquired by the

    judgment debtor after registration.

  17. 17 It is also worth noting that the 'name only' register

    pertained in England and Wales until amendment was effected

    requiring the judgment creditor to identify the lands which were to be

    affected by the charge.

  18. 18 Registration effects a lien or charge on all the lands of the

    judgment debtor in the district covered by the relevant Land Registry

    office. The procedure to enforce the charge is initiated by the

    START OF PAGE 35

    judgment creditor applying to the Supreme Court calling on the

    debtor and any other person having the legal estate in the land to

    show cause why the land should not be sold to realise the amount of

    the judgment debt.

  19. 19 If sale is ordered the Execution Act empowers the sheriff to

    execute a conveyance in the prescribed form. Registration of that

    conveyance to a third party vests the judgment debtor's interest in the

    purchaser free of the judgment proceeded on and of any subsequent

    charges. A purchaser is not bound to inquire whether the

    requirements of the Act have been met and the purchaser's rights are

    not affected by any breach, impropriety or irregularity in the sale to

    which he or she is not a party, even if the purchaser has notice

    thereof.

  20. 20 The British Columbia Law Reform Commission ('BCLRC')

    issued a report on execution of judgments against land in 1978.[12] It

    did not consider the question of whether exemptions should be

    granted for certain types of property (eg family homes or

    'homesteads').

  21. 21 The report made some observations on the rights of third

    parties – such as a joint tenant of the judgment debtor. Under British

    Columbia law registration of judgment against the judgment debtor's

    interest in land does not effect a severance of the joint tenancy.

    Accordingly, if the judgment debtor predeceases the other joint

    tenant, the judgment mortgage will be defeated. This aspect of

    British Columbia law received criticism from eminent sources –

    including a former Chief Justice of the British Columbia Supreme

    Court.[13]

  22. 22 Notwithstanding, the BCLRC concluded that registration of

    the judgment should continue not to effect a severance of the joint

    tenancy. Instead, the registration should attach to the interest of the

    surviving joint tenant. To temper the potential injustice to the

    surviving joint tenant, the BCLRC proposed a complex form of

    statutory 'marshalling' so as to limit the judgment creditor's claim.

    START OF PAGE 36

  23. 23 As regards tenants in common, the BCLRC recommended

    that a judgment creditor who registered judgment should have

    standing to bring proceedings for partition and sale of the property.

    Furthermore, this should be done in the context of execution

    proceedings under the Execution Act rather than under separate

    partition proceedings.

  24. 24 The BCLRC also considered whether it should be possible

    to register execution against land before judgment is obtained. The

    BCLRC was in favour of such a proposal: however this 'useful

    innovation' should be subject to certain safeguards:

    (a) the application to register should be made to court and on

    notice to the defendant;

    (b) the order should not be granted unless the court is satisfied

    that the defendant is 'insecure' in the sense that judgment

    might not otherwise be satisfied if the order were not to be

    made;

    (c) a balance of convenience test should be applied;
    (d) the order should only be granted to a plaintiff who has

    verified under oath that there is no reasonable defence to the

    claim and that the plaintiff's action has a reasonable chance

    of success;

    (e) if the defendant is successful he or she should be granted

    any damages occasioned by the pre-judgment charge.

  25. 25 The question as to whether such a procedure is desirable is

    discussed in Chapter 4 below.

    D New Zealand
  26. 26 The equivalent procedure in New Zealand is provided for

    under the High Court rules dealing with charging orders and writs for

    sale. Under these provisions a judgment creditor can obtain a

    charging order the effect of which is to freeze the dealings with the

    land. The judgment creditor loses any security if the judgment debtor

    becomes bankrupt while the charging order is in place. Sale is

    effected by writ of sale.

  27. 27 Under rule 567 of the New Zealand High Court Rules a

    plaintiff may only obtain a charging order before judgment upon

    proof that the defendant is making away with his or her property, or is

    START OF PAGE 37

    absent from or about to quit the jurisdiction, with intent to defeat the

    interests of his or her creditors or the plaintiff.

  28. 28 After judgment has been entered, a charging order may be

    issued without leave, at the request of the judgment creditor. Under

    rule 570 any person claiming to be prejudicially affected by a

    charging order may apply to court to have the order varied or

    rescinded, or to have the registration thereof cancelled or modified.

    Any person appearing to have a charge, lien or other claim on the

    land, may be summoned to appear, and is entitled to be heard in any

    application concerning the land.

  29. 29 When issued, the charging order is deemed absolute in the

    first instance. The charging order is then registered against the

    certificate of title to the land. The charging order must either:

    (a) contain a description of the land affected sufficient to

    identify it; or

    (b) refer to a certificate of title or other instrument containing

    such a description; or

    (c) contain a plan showing its extent, boundaries and relative

    position (unless the land is the whole of the land comprised

    in a certificate or certificates of title, or is shown separately

    on a plan deposited under the transfer of registered land

    legislation – the Land Transfer Act 1952).

  30. 30 Where the charging order is made in respect of land which

    is not registered under the Land Transfer Act 1952, it must be

    registered in the appropriate registry of deeds. A charging order in

    respect of such land must contain:

    (a) a description of the land affected sufficient to identify the

    land; and

    (b) a plan of the land showing its extent, boundaries and relative

    position.

  31. 31 Until registration of the charging order, no sale or transfer

    of the land or any part thereof under a writ of sale has any effect

    against a purchaser for valuable consideration, notwithstanding that

    the writ of sale may have actually been delivered for execution at the

    time of purchase, and that the purchaser may have had actual or

    constructive notice of the delivery of the writ of sale for execution.

    START OF PAGE 38

  32. 32 Unless an instrument of transfer or a deed of conveyance

    or assignment consequent on a writ of sale of the land is registered

    within two years after the date of the charging order, the charging

    order ceases to bind the land and is deemed to be discharged.

    However, the court has the power to extend the period during which

    the charging order shall bind the land.

Note 1   Section 3(4) of theCharging Orders Act 1979.    [Back]

Note 2   Perry v Phoenix Assurance plc [1988] 1 WLR 940.    [Back]

Note 3   Harman v Glencross [1985] Fam 49, 57B.    [Back]

Note 4   SI 1981/226 (NI 6).    [Back]

Note 5   See An End Based On Means (Free Legal Advice Centre 2003) at 79.    [Back]

Note 6   See Article 47 of theJudgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.    [Back]

Note 7   See Article 46(3) of theJudgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.    [Back]

Note 8   Article 47 of the Judgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.    [Back]

Note 9   Article 48 of the Judgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.    [Back]

Note 10   RSBC 1969 c 135.    [Back]

Note 11   1978 British Columbia Bill No 32 proclaimed effective and coming into force in July 1981.    [Back]

Note 12    Law Reform Commission of British Columbia Report on Execution against Land (LRC 40) 1978.    [Back]

Note 13   Davey CJ.    [Back]

Ý
Ü   Þ


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/other/IELRC/2004/CP30(3).html