BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Irish Law Reform Commission Papers and Reports


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Irish Law Reform Commission Papers and Reports >> Judgment Mortgages, Consultation Paper on (LRC CP 30-2004) [2004] IELRC CP30(4) (March 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/other/IELRC/2004/CP30(4).html
Cite as: [2004] IELRC CP30(4)

[New search] [Help]


    START OF PAGE 39

    CHAPTER 4 PROPOSALS FOR GENERAL REFORM
    A Introduction and Terminology
  1. 01 The following is a summary of the proposals for reform of

    the general law and procedure relating to judgment mortgages and the

    reasons for those proposals. As a preliminary matter, the

    Commission recommends that the terminology 'judgment mortgage'

    be retained, given that its import is well known to most practitioners.

    Furthermore, the effect of the suggested reform does not radically

    alter the nature of the process such that a change in terminology

    requires to be considered.

    B Procedure
    (1) Type of Record
  2. 02 One of the central policy issues to be decided in considering

    reform of the law relating to judgment mortgages is whether the

    existing system whereby the record is kept with regard to interests in

    land, by the Land Registry or Registry of Deeds (as appropriate),

    should continue; or whether it should be replaced with a central

    register of judgments referable to the names and addresses of

    judgment debtors. The latter would have the advantage of potentially

    operating to cover all existing and after-acquired interests in land

    obtained by the judgment debtor, and avoiding the difficulties

    associated with some of the case law with regard to identification of

    the property.

  3. 03 Equally, the Commission notes that a 'name only' register

    pertained in British Columbia until the enactment of amending

    legislation in 1981, and in England and Wales until legislative

    amendment. This change appears to have been prompted by a

    recurrence of situations of 'mistaken identity' - ie registration of a

    START OF PAGE 40

    judgment mortgage against the wrong 'Joe Murphy'.[1] It is also

    notable that this system of registration does not currently operate in

    any of the jurisdictions surveyed in this Paper. Instead, the prevalent

    system appears to be one which operates by reference to a description

    of the land, and which is maintained by the appropriate land registry.

  4. 04 In the light of the fact that the jurisdictions of which we are

    aware which did operate a 'name register' subsequently changed to a

    'land register', and in the light of our view (see paragraphs 4.12 -

  5. 16 below) that the difficulties presented by some of the case law

    dealing with identification of the land can be overcome, the

    Commission recommends that the register be maintained in the Land

    Registry, and the Registry of Deeds, (as appropriate) with regard

    primarily to the property.

  6. 05 The Commission provisionally recommends that the record
    of judgment mortgages be maintained in the Land Registry and
    Registry of Deeds as appropriate, with regard primarily to the
    property.
    (2) Procedure for Applying for Judgment Mortgage
  7. 06 There are a number of different options with regard to the

    process by which the judgment mortgage is obtained by the judgment

    creditor. One is for application to the court which may grant the order

    at its discretion.[2] Another is for application to be made to a central

    office for the enforcement of judgments.[3] The third is for the

    judgment creditor to be automatically entitled to register a judgment

    mortgage once judgment is made.[4]

  8. 07 On balance, the Commission considers it to be preferable to

    maintain the status quo and to provide that a judgment creditor be

    automatically entitled to choose to enforce an unsatisfied judgment by

    way of judgment mortgage. It should be borne in mind that the

    judgment mortgage is essentially a method of enforcing a judgment

    against a judgment debtor who is unable or unwilling to satisfy a

    judgment debt. In the Commission's view there should be no bar ab

    initio to a judgment creditor availing of the judgment mortgage

    START OF PAGE 41

    process. We believe the proper function for judicial discretion is with

    regard to disposal of the property - particularly where the property is

    a family home (see Chapter 5 below).

  9. 08 The Commission provisionally recommends that legislation
    should provide that a judgment creditor be automatically entitled to
    choose to enforce an unsatisfied judgment by way of judgment
    mortgage.
  10. 09 The Commission has not, for the purposes of this Paper,

    reached any view on whether the system for enforcement of

    judgments by way of judgment mortgage should be delegated to an

    office with the power to impose charges unilaterally. This raises

    questions as to the compatibility of such powers with the Constitution

    and which extend beyond the reform of the law relating to judgment

    mortgages. Furthermore, such considerations seem more appropriate

    in the context of a general review of the law relating to enforcement

    of judgments.

  11. 10 The judgment creditor need not indicate precisely the

    amount of costs and/or interest decreed. It is sufficient for the

    judgment creditor to state whether, and, if applicable, the extent to

    which costs were awarded. The precise amount of costs and interest

    can be verified later by a supplemental form or affidavit (if the matter

    has reached the stage of application to sell the property thereby

    requiring court sanction).

  12. 11 The Commission provisionally recommends that the precise
    amount of costs and/or interest decreed need not be stated but can be
    verified later by a supplemental form or affidavit.
    (3) Issues as to Identification
  13. 12 As regards identification of the parties and the property to

    be affected by the judgment mortgage, the guiding principle here is

    that the judgment mortgagee should be required to identify with

    reasonable precision whom the judgment debtor is and the lands to be

    affected.

  14. 13 As regards identification of the judgment debtor, this should

    be straightforward and the judgment creditor should be entitled to

    refer to the information in any pleadings or affidavits in the

    proceedings. Any innocent error should be capable of rectification

    and should not affect the validity of the judgment mortgage.

    START OF PAGE 42

  15. 14 The Commission provisionally recommends that an
    innocent error as regards identification of the judgment debtor should
    be capable of rectification and should not affect the validity of the
    judgment mortgage.
  16. 15 Equally, the position with regard to registered and

    unregistered land needs to be equated. No amendment is required

    with regard to registered land. Section 71 of the Registration of Title

    Act 1964 appears to operate well and so the position should continue

    that the judgment creditor should refer to the county and folio

    number. As regards unregistered land, it should be provided that the

    land should be identified with reasonable precision. Any innocent

    error, misdescription or absence of detail should be capable of

    rectification and should not affect the inherent validity of the

    judgment mortgage.

  17. 16 The Commission provisionally recommends that
    unregistered land should be identified with reasonable precision and
    that any innocent error, misdescription or absence of detail should be
    capable of rectification and should not affect the inherent validity of
    the judgment mortgage.
    (4) Availability of Pre-judgment Relief
  18. 17 The Commission does not recommend that reform of the

    law in this area include provision for pre-judgment relief, as appears

    to be available in New Zealand and British Columbia. In our opinion,

    a plaintiff who has a genuine case that a defendant might wilfully

    dispose of property in order to become 'judgment proof' already has

    adequate remedies in the form of Mareva relief.

    (5) Modernisation of Mode of Application
  19. 18 As regards implementing the procedure, the Commission's

    preference is for a form to be promulgated by Rules of Court, subject

    to adaptation as the situation requires, setting out the necessary

    particulars, including the parties to the action, and details of the

    property to be subject to the judgment mortgage sufficient to identify

    it. Procedures should also be adopted for the High Court, the Circuit

    Court and the District Court to issue 'certificates of judgment', setting

    out on a pro forma basis the money judgment or decree. The form of

    application should have the status of a statutory declaration.

  20. 19 Given the special treatment which the Commission

    recommends should be enjoyed by the family home, a judgment

    START OF PAGE 43

    creditor should be asked to indicate whether, to the best of the

    deponent's knowledge or belief, the property is a residential

    dwelling.[5] It would appear to be unreasonable to ask it to confirm if it

    is 'family home' within the meaning of the Family Home Protection

    Act 1976 as the judgment creditor is unlikely to be able to form a

    view on the matter. However, this request for information, together

    with a legend on the form (and in any accompanying documentation)

    setting out the special procedures concerning how the family home is

    dealt with should bring home to the judgment creditor the

    implications of the legislation in this regard.

  21. 20 Once the form is completed, it should be lodged, together

    with the certificate of judgment, with the Land Registry or the

    Registry of Deeds (as appropriate).

  22. 21 It should be confirmed that the judgment creditor can apply

    for registration of the judgment mortgage notwithstanding that the

    judgment debtor has obtained a stay on the execution of the judgment

    by order of the court. In the Commission's view this should apply

    irrespective of the reason for which the stay is granted (eg to give the

    judgment debtor time to pay, or to enable the judgment debtor to

    bring an appeal).

    C Effect of Registration
  23. 22 Registration should be provided to operate as a charge by

    the judgment debtor over the property specified in the form. It should

    be provided that the charge shall be deemed to have been granted for

    valuable consideration (save for the purposes of the Family Home

    Protection Act 1976 - see Chapter 5 below). It should be provided

    that the charge has priority over the following:

    (a) all later registered judgment mortgages;
    (b) all later encumbrances whether registered or not.
  24. 23 The charge should not have priority over any prior charges

    or equitable interests, whether registered or not. In this regard the

    Commission considers that the law should be left unchanged.

  25. 24 A judgment mortgage should 'travel with the land' and

    should bind all subsequent purchasers for value and volunteers.

    START OF PAGE 44

  26. 25 Registration of a judgment mortgage should constitute

    notice to all subsequent encumbrancers, purchasers and volunteers.

    D Renewal of Judgment Mortgage

    The 1850 Act imposes no requirement that a judgment mortgage be

    renewed periodically and the Commission sees no convincing

    argument for introducing such a provision in any new legislation.

    E Enforcement
  27. 26 The Commission recommends that the judgment creditor

    have all the rights of a chargee who has provided consideration.

    Whilst this, in theory, could include a power of sale under the

    Conveyancing Acts, in practical terms, it is difficult to envisage how

    to provide for enforcement of sale without a hearing to declare the

    property well charged with the judgment mortgage.[6] This is because

    if the judgment mortgagee is given the power to sell outside court,

    this will inevitably cause difficulties in that the interests of third

    parties could be overridden (such as other mortgagees, or family

    members with rights in equity or under the Family Home Protection

    Act 1976). Enacting a procedure for sale directly by the judgment

    creditor could lead to a proliferation of applications for injunction to

    restrain a judgment mortgagee from proceeding with a sale out of

    court. Accordingly, the Commission suggests that the existing system

    whereby the judgment mortgagee proceed by way of mortgage suit

    should continue.

  28. 27 The Commission recommends that a judgment creditor
    should have all the rights of a chargee who has provided
    consideration but that, given the practical difficulties of providing for
    enforcement of sale without a hearing to declare the property well
    charged with the judgment mortgage, the existing system whereby the
    judgment mortgagee proceeds by way of mortgage suit should
    continue.
  29. 28 However, once again, the Commission considers that it is

    appropriate to draw a distinction between situations where the

    property is a family home, and situations where it is not. It seems to

    START OF PAGE 45

    the Commission that there is merit in providing that, save where the

    property is a family home, the court should only grant relief to a party

    objecting to a sale pursuant to a judgment mortgage where it is shown

    that the sale would result in a clear and substantial prejudice to that

    party. In many instances, a judgment mortgage enforcing a sale of the

    property will to all practical intents and purposes be acting for the

    benefit of prior encumbrancers. This is because they will have a prior

    interest in the proceeds of sale and it is very likely that the judgment

    mortgage will be last in the line of secured creditors.

  30. 29 As noted above a judgment creditor should be required to

    indicate whether the property is a residential dwelling.[7]

  31. 30 In this regard, the Commission recommends a provision that

    the mere fact that a contract of mortgage or loan is terminated before

    its due date should not be a sufficient reason on its own for refusing

    to order a sale. The position we have in mind here is that it should

    not be open to a bank or other financial institution to object to an

    order for sale sought by a judgment creditor merely because to grant

    the order will mean that its loan or mortgage contract with the

    judgment debtor will be terminated early (thereby depriving the bank

    or other financial institution of resultant profits).

    F Discharge and Satisfaction
  32. 31 Section 9 of the Judgment Mortgage (Ireland) Act 1850

    makes provision for noting on the entries relating to a judgment

    mortgage in the Registry of Deeds a memorandum of satisfaction of

    the judgment mortgage. The section further provides that satisfaction

    of the judgment mortgage shall be stated in every official search

    issued by the Registry of Deeds.[8] Section 5 of the Judgment

    Mortgage (Ireland) Act 1858 provides for the further step of actual

    cancellation of the judgment mortgage. In the event of a judgment

    debtor discharging the amount due under a judgment mortgage, a

    Satisfaction Piece is filed in the Judgments Office of the relevant

    court where it is noted and a Certificate of Satisfaction is issued. This

    is then lodged with the Registrar of Titles in either the Land Registry

    or the Registry of Deeds as appropriate and a memorandum of

    START OF PAGE 46

    satisfaction appended to the affidavit of judgment. Pursuant to

    section 5 of the 1858 Act the registration of the judgment mortgage is

    deemed to be null and void. Without any further deed or conveyance

    the legal or other interest or estate in the lands affected by the

    mortgage automatically revests in the debtor. In other words, the

    entry of the memorandum of satisfaction has the same effect as

    execution of a deed of reconveyance.[9] Under Rule 122 of the Land

    Registry Rules a Form 76 requisition by a judgment creditor or his or

    her personal representative may also serve to cancel a judgment

    mortgage.[10]

  33. 32 The Commission is of the view that there appear to be no

    particular legal issues arising from the process by which judgment

    mortgages are discharged. Accordingly, the Commission

    recommends that the current procedures be preserved with any

    necessary modifications consequent upon the updated forms and

    procedures recommended.

    G Miscellaneous
  34. 33 A judgment mortgage registered against a company, and an
    individual, should, subject to section 284(2) of the Companies Act
    1963, and section 51 of the Bankruptcy Act 1988, enjoy the same
    priority as if the judgment mortgage were a validly created charge for
    valuable consideration.
  35. 34 Section 291 of the Companies Act 1963 (which deprives a
    judgment creditor of priority in a liquidation if the judgment creditor
    has not seized the land or appointed a receiver) should be repealed.

    START OF PAGE 47

  36. 35 Section 102 of the Companies Act 1963 should be amended
    so that there is a duty on a judgment creditor to register a judgment
    mortgage in the same manner as a charge under section 99 of the
    Companies Act 1963. Failure to register the judgment mortgage
    should render the judgment mortgage void as against any liquidator
    or other creditor of the company.
  37. 36 It should be confirmed that it is possible to register a
    judgment mortgage over the proceeds of sale of an equitable interest,
    as well as the equitable interest itself.
  38. 37 Any amendments to be made to the judgment mortgage
    procedure should take into account prospective changes to be effected
    pursuant to the introduction of electronic conveyancing.
  39. 38 It is recommended that a stay on execution of judgment
    should not inhibit the ability of the plaintiff to register immediately a
    judgment mortgage save where the court makes an explicit order
    restraining such registration.
  40. 39 There should be a statutory declaration that a judgment
    creditor who has effected a sale holds the proceeds for the account of
    any prior incumbrancers.

Note 1   It would appear that such a statement is capable of being defamatory.    [Back]

Note 2   As in England and Wales.    [Back]

Note 3   As in Northern Ireland.    [Back]

Note 4   As is currently the position in Ireland, New Zealand and British Columbia.    [Back]

Note 5   See paragraph 5.17 below.    [Back]

Note 6   See An End Based on Means (Free Legal Advice Centre 2003) at 22, 79-80 and 113.    [Back]

Note 7   It is envisaged that a particular form will be prescribed for this purpose.    [Back]

Note 8   The memorandum is entered onto the Registry of Deed’s computerized database.    [Back]

Note 9   Wylie, Conveyancing Law (Butterworths 1999) at 454.    [Back]

Note 10   Rule 122 of the Land Registry Rules 1972 (SI 230 of 1972) states: “Subject to an inhibition in the register to the contrary, an entry of notice of the deposit of an affidavit of judgment may be cancelled on production in the Registry of the certificate specified in section 9 of the Judgment Mortgage (Ireland) Act 1850, of the satisfaction of the judgment, decree or order in respect of which the affidavit was deposited, or of a requisition by the judgment creditor or his personal representative, in Form 76, for its discharge.” See Browne v Mariena Properties Ltd [1998] 1 IR 568 at 585 where Laffoy J points out that in addition, any person having an interest in a registered burden or registered property may apply on affidavit in form 71B to have the burden cancelled.    [Back]

Ý
Ü   Þ


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/other/IELRC/2004/CP30(4).html