BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Irish Law Reform Commission Papers and Reports |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Irish Law Reform Commission Papers and Reports >> Judgment Mortgages, Consultation Paper on (LRC CP 30-2004) [2004] IELRC CP30(4) (March 2004) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/other/IELRC/2004/CP30(4).html Cite as: [2004] IELRC CP30(4) |
[New search] [Help]
START OF PAGE 39
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSALS FOR GENERAL REFORM
A Introduction and Terminology
the general law and procedure relating to judgment mortgages and the
reasons for those proposals. As a preliminary matter, the
Commission recommends that the terminology 'judgment mortgage'
be retained, given that its import is well known to most practitioners.
Furthermore, the effect of the suggested reform does not radically
alter the nature of the process such that a change in terminology
requires to be considered.
B Procedure
(1) Type of Record
reform of the law relating to judgment mortgages is whether the
existing system whereby the record is kept with regard to interests in
land, by the Land Registry or Registry of Deeds (as appropriate),
should continue; or whether it should be replaced with a central
register of judgments referable to the names and addresses of
judgment debtors. The latter would have the advantage of potentially
operating to cover all existing and after-acquired interests in land
obtained by the judgment debtor, and avoiding the difficulties
associated with some of the case law with regard to identification of
the property.
pertained in British Columbia until the enactment of amending
legislation in 1981, and in England and Wales until legislative
amendment. This change appears to have been prompted by a
recurrence of situations of 'mistaken identity' - ie registration of a
START OF PAGE 40
judgment mortgage against the wrong 'Joe Murphy'.[1] It is also
notable that this system of registration does not currently operate in
any of the jurisdictions surveyed in this Paper. Instead, the prevalent
system appears to be one which operates by reference to a description
of the land, and which is maintained by the appropriate land registry.
aware which did operate a 'name register' subsequently changed to a
'land register', and in the light of our view (see paragraphs 4.12 -
dealing with identification of the land can be overcome, the
Commission recommends that the register be maintained in the Land
Registry, and the Registry of Deeds, (as appropriate) with regard
primarily to the property.
of judgment mortgages be maintained in the Land Registry and
Registry of Deeds as appropriate, with regard primarily to the
property.
(2) Procedure for Applying for Judgment Mortgage
process by which the judgment mortgage is obtained by the judgment
creditor. One is for application to the court which may grant the order
at its discretion.[2] Another is for application to be made to a central
office for the enforcement of judgments.[3] The third is for the
judgment creditor to be automatically entitled to register a judgment
mortgage once judgment is made.[4]
maintain the status quo and to provide that a judgment creditor be
automatically entitled to choose to enforce an unsatisfied judgment by
way of judgment mortgage. It should be borne in mind that the
judgment mortgage is essentially a method of enforcing a judgment
against a judgment debtor who is unable or unwilling to satisfy a
judgment debt. In the Commission's view there should be no bar ab
initio to a judgment creditor availing of the judgment mortgage
START OF PAGE 41
process. We believe the proper function for judicial discretion is with
regard to disposal of the property - particularly where the property is
a family home (see Chapter 5 below).
should provide that a judgment creditor be automatically entitled to
choose to enforce an unsatisfied judgment by way of judgment
mortgage.
reached any view on whether the system for enforcement of
judgments by way of judgment mortgage should be delegated to an
office with the power to impose charges unilaterally. This raises
questions as to the compatibility of such powers with the Constitution
and which extend beyond the reform of the law relating to judgment
mortgages. Furthermore, such considerations seem more appropriate
in the context of a general review of the law relating to enforcement
of judgments.
amount of costs and/or interest decreed. It is sufficient for the
judgment creditor to state whether, and, if applicable, the extent to
which costs were awarded. The precise amount of costs and interest
can be verified later by a supplemental form or affidavit (if the matter
has reached the stage of application to sell the property thereby
requiring court sanction).
amount of costs and/or interest decreed need not be stated but can be
verified later by a supplemental form or affidavit.
(3) Issues as to Identification
be affected by the judgment mortgage, the guiding principle here is
that the judgment mortgagee should be required to identify with
reasonable precision whom the judgment debtor is and the lands to be
affected.
be straightforward and the judgment creditor should be entitled to
refer to the information in any pleadings or affidavits in the
proceedings. Any innocent error should be capable of rectification
and should not affect the validity of the judgment mortgage.
START OF PAGE 42
innocent error as regards identification of the judgment debtor should
be capable of rectification and should not affect the validity of the
judgment mortgage.
unregistered land needs to be equated. No amendment is required
with regard to registered land. Section 71 of the Registration of Title
Act 1964 appears to operate well and so the position should continue
that the judgment creditor should refer to the county and folio
number. As regards unregistered land, it should be provided that the
land should be identified with reasonable precision. Any innocent
error, misdescription or absence of detail should be capable of
rectification and should not affect the inherent validity of the
judgment mortgage.
unregistered land should be identified with reasonable precision and
that any innocent error, misdescription or absence of detail should be
capable of rectification and should not affect the inherent validity of
the judgment mortgage.
(4) Availability of Pre-judgment Relief
law in this area include provision for pre-judgment relief, as appears
to be available in New Zealand and British Columbia. In our opinion,
a plaintiff who has a genuine case that a defendant might wilfully
dispose of property in order to become 'judgment proof' already has
adequate remedies in the form of Mareva relief.
(5) Modernisation of Mode of Application
preference is for a form to be promulgated by Rules of Court, subject
to adaptation as the situation requires, setting out the necessary
particulars, including the parties to the action, and details of the
property to be subject to the judgment mortgage sufficient to identify
it. Procedures should also be adopted for the High Court, the Circuit
Court and the District Court to issue 'certificates of judgment', setting
out on a pro forma basis the money judgment or decree. The form of
application should have the status of a statutory declaration.
recommends should be enjoyed by the family home, a judgment
START OF PAGE 43
creditor should be asked to indicate whether, to the best of the
deponent's knowledge or belief, the property is a residential
dwelling.[5] It would appear to be unreasonable to ask it to confirm if it
is 'family home' within the meaning of the Family Home Protection
Act 1976 as the judgment creditor is unlikely to be able to form a
view on the matter. However, this request for information, together
with a legend on the form (and in any accompanying documentation)
setting out the special procedures concerning how the family home is
dealt with should bring home to the judgment creditor the
implications of the legislation in this regard.
with the certificate of judgment, with the Land Registry or the
Registry of Deeds (as appropriate).
for registration of the judgment mortgage notwithstanding that the
judgment debtor has obtained a stay on the execution of the judgment
by order of the court. In the Commission's view this should apply
irrespective of the reason for which the stay is granted (eg to give the
judgment debtor time to pay, or to enable the judgment debtor to
bring an appeal).
C Effect of Registration
the judgment debtor over the property specified in the form. It should
be provided that the charge shall be deemed to have been granted for
valuable consideration (save for the purposes of the Family Home
Protection Act 1976 - see Chapter 5 below). It should be provided
that the charge has priority over the following:
(a) all later registered judgment mortgages;
(b) all later encumbrances whether registered or not.
or equitable interests, whether registered or not. In this regard the
Commission considers that the law should be left unchanged.
should bind all subsequent purchasers for value and volunteers.
START OF PAGE 44
notice to all subsequent encumbrancers, purchasers and volunteers.
D Renewal of Judgment Mortgage
The 1850 Act imposes no requirement that a judgment mortgage be
renewed periodically and the Commission sees no convincing
argument for introducing such a provision in any new legislation.
E Enforcement
have all the rights of a chargee who has provided consideration.
Whilst this, in theory, could include a power of sale under the
Conveyancing Acts, in practical terms, it is difficult to envisage how
to provide for enforcement of sale without a hearing to declare the
property well charged with the judgment mortgage.[6] This is because
if the judgment mortgagee is given the power to sell outside court,
this will inevitably cause difficulties in that the interests of third
parties could be overridden (such as other mortgagees, or family
members with rights in equity or under the Family Home Protection
Act 1976). Enacting a procedure for sale directly by the judgment
creditor could lead to a proliferation of applications for injunction to
restrain a judgment mortgagee from proceeding with a sale out of
court. Accordingly, the Commission suggests that the existing system
whereby the judgment mortgagee proceed by way of mortgage suit
should continue.
should have all the rights of a chargee who has provided
consideration but that, given the practical difficulties of providing for
enforcement of sale without a hearing to declare the property well
charged with the judgment mortgage, the existing system whereby the
judgment mortgagee proceeds by way of mortgage suit should
continue.
appropriate to draw a distinction between situations where the
property is a family home, and situations where it is not. It seems to
START OF PAGE 45
the Commission that there is merit in providing that, save where the
property is a family home, the court should only grant relief to a party
objecting to a sale pursuant to a judgment mortgage where it is shown
that the sale would result in a clear and substantial prejudice to that
party. In many instances, a judgment mortgage enforcing a sale of the
property will to all practical intents and purposes be acting for the
benefit of prior encumbrancers. This is because they will have a prior
interest in the proceeds of sale and it is very likely that the judgment
mortgage will be last in the line of secured creditors.
indicate whether the property is a residential dwelling.[7]
the mere fact that a contract of mortgage or loan is terminated before
its due date should not be a sufficient reason on its own for refusing
to order a sale. The position we have in mind here is that it should
not be open to a bank or other financial institution to object to an
order for sale sought by a judgment creditor merely because to grant
the order will mean that its loan or mortgage contract with the
judgment debtor will be terminated early (thereby depriving the bank
or other financial institution of resultant profits).
F Discharge and Satisfaction
makes provision for noting on the entries relating to a judgment
mortgage in the Registry of Deeds a memorandum of satisfaction of
the judgment mortgage. The section further provides that satisfaction
of the judgment mortgage shall be stated in every official search
issued by the Registry of Deeds.[8] Section 5 of the Judgment
Mortgage (Ireland) Act 1858 provides for the further step of actual
cancellation of the judgment mortgage. In the event of a judgment
debtor discharging the amount due under a judgment mortgage, a
Satisfaction Piece is filed in the Judgments Office of the relevant
court where it is noted and a Certificate of Satisfaction is issued. This
is then lodged with the Registrar of Titles in either the Land Registry
or the Registry of Deeds as appropriate and a memorandum of
START OF PAGE 46
satisfaction appended to the affidavit of judgment. Pursuant to
section 5 of the 1858 Act the registration of the judgment mortgage is
deemed to be null and void. Without any further deed or conveyance
the legal or other interest or estate in the lands affected by the
mortgage automatically revests in the debtor. In other words, the
entry of the memorandum of satisfaction has the same effect as
execution of a deed of reconveyance.[9] Under Rule 122 of the Land
Registry Rules a Form 76 requisition by a judgment creditor or his or
her personal representative may also serve to cancel a judgment
mortgage.[10]
particular legal issues arising from the process by which judgment
mortgages are discharged. Accordingly, the Commission
recommends that the current procedures be preserved with any
necessary modifications consequent upon the updated forms and
procedures recommended.
G Miscellaneous
individual, should, subject to section 284(2) of the Companies Act
1963, and section 51 of the Bankruptcy Act 1988, enjoy the same
priority as if the judgment mortgage were a validly created charge for
valuable consideration.
judgment creditor of priority in a liquidation if the judgment creditor
has not seized the land or appointed a receiver) should be repealed.
START OF PAGE 47
so that there is a duty on a judgment creditor to register a judgment
mortgage in the same manner as a charge under section 99 of the
Companies Act 1963. Failure to register the judgment mortgage
should render the judgment mortgage void as against any liquidator
or other creditor of the company.
judgment mortgage over the proceeds of sale of an equitable interest,
as well as the equitable interest itself.
procedure should take into account prospective changes to be effected
pursuant to the introduction of electronic conveyancing.
should not inhibit the ability of the plaintiff to register immediately a
judgment mortgage save where the court makes an explicit order
restraining such registration.
creditor who has effected a sale holds the proceeds for the account of
any prior incumbrancers.
Note 1 It would appear that such a statement is capable of being defamatory. [Back] Note 2 As in England and Wales. [Back] Note 3 As in Northern Ireland. [Back] Note 4 As is currently the position in Ireland, New Zealand and British Columbia. [Back] Note 5 See paragraph 5.17 below. [Back] Note 6 See An End Based on Means (Free Legal Advice Centre 2003) at 22, 79-80 and 113. [Back] Note 7 It is envisaged that a particular form will be prescribed for this purpose. [Back] Note 8 The memorandum is entered onto the Registry of Deed’s computerized database. [Back] Note 9 Wylie, Conveyancing Law (Butterworths 1999) at 454. [Back] Note 10 Rule 122 of the Land Registry Rules 1972 (SI 230 of 1972) states: “Subject
to an inhibition in the register to the contrary, an entry of notice of the
deposit of an affidavit of judgment may be cancelled on production in the
Registry of the certificate specified in section 9 of the Judgment Mortgage
(Ireland) Act 1850, of the satisfaction of the judgment, decree or order in
respect of which the affidavit was deposited, or of a requisition by the
judgment creditor or his personal representative, in Form 76, for its
discharge.” See Browne v Mariena Properties Ltd [1998] 1 IR 568 at 585
where Laffoy J points out that in addition, any person having an interest in
a registered burden or registered property may apply on affidavit in form
71B to have the burden cancelled. [Back]