BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Gill v Forret. [1622] Mor 12357 (15 November 1622) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1622/Mor2912357-136.html Cite as: [1622] Mor 12357 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1622] Mor 12357
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Payment and Consignation how relevant to be proved.
Date: M'Gill
v.
Forret
15 November 1622
Case No.No 136.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action betwixt M'Gill, relict of —— and Forret, the Lords found that the payment of 100 merks addebted by a bond in writ, might not be proved by witness, and that the act of Session, ordaining that sums within L. 100 might be proved by witnesses, was to be understood when the debt was not grounded upon writ.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting