BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Creditors of Andrew Bryson v His Son. [1662] Mor 3977 (14 November 1662) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1662/Mor1003977-019.html Cite as: [1662] Mor 3977 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1662] Mor 3977
Subject_1 EXHIBITION.
Subject_2 SECT. IV. Who liable to Exhibit.
Date: Creditors of Andrew Bryson
v.
His Son
14 November 1662
Case No.No 19.
Oath ex officio anent having writs, was allowed to be given by a person, if they had been in his possession, and how he had put them away, but not if he knew who had them.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an account and reckoning betwixt the Creditors and Bairns of umquhile Andrew Bryson, the auditor being warranted to call all parties, havers of the said umquhile Andrew his count books before him, his son Mr Andrew being called and examined upon oath, depones, that he neither has them, nor had them since the intenting of the cause, but refused to depone upon his having of the same at any time before, or upon his knowledge who had them.
The Lords having heard the auditor's report thereanent, found that he ought not to be examined upon his knowledge who had them, but that he ought to depone if, at any time before the citation he had the same, and fraudfully put the same away, quia pro possessore habetur qui dolo desiit possidere.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting